2026 Lincoln Aviator Safety Rating

Midsize luxury SUVs Β· Current IIHS listing Β· IIHS source checked 2026-09-16

Provisional record

The 2026 Lincoln Aviator is not yet ranked. Our required evidence is complete for 3 of 4 primary tests and 4 of 4 selected occupant-protection details. Missing results are shown as missing, never assumed.

Reported so far: Small overlap front Good; Moderate overlap front (updated test) Good; Side (updated test) Good.

Which build and equipment does this score describe?

Latest applicable build; standard AEB and lowest current-trim headlight rating. Headlights use the lowest rating among applicable current trims; this is a conservative equipment baseline, not a claim that every trim has identical results. Confirm the production date and equipment of the car you are buying.

  • Rating applies to 2020-26 models built after May 2020
Pedestrian crash prevention: baseline Good
  • Good β€” standard Pre-Collision Assist. Rating applies to all 2025-26 models

Optional-system results are shown separately. Combining the best rating from different packages does not establish that one purchasable configuration earns them all. Check IIHS equipment details.

β€”
Safety score / 100
Awaiting 1 results
No award
IIHS award
No current award
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
NHTSA overall
Reference only, not scored
$58,605
Starting MSRP
Approximate base trim
11
Class driver death rate
per million vehicle-years; all vehicles 38

IIHS crash-test results

Front Crash Prevention: PedestrianGood
Small Overlap Front Good
Moderate Overlap Front: Updated Test Good
Side: Updated Test Good
Detailed results by test (48 entries)

IIHS publishes these under the test they belong to, so the same label can appear more than once. Rear restraints and kinematics, rear head protection, structure and safety cage, and front restraints are the four that count toward the score (25%).

Small overlap front

Rating applies to 2020-26 models built after May 2020

Overall driver-side evaluation Good
Structure and safety cage Good
Driver injury measures
Head/neck Good
Chest Good
Hip/thigh Good
Lower leg/foot Acceptable
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics Good

Small overlap front

Rating applies to 2020-26 models built after May 2020

Overall passenger-side evaluation Good
Structure and safety cage Good
Passenger injury measures
Head/neck Good
Chest Good
Hip/thigh Good
Lower leg/foot Good
Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics Good
Driver injury measures
Head/neck Good
Chest Good
Hip/thigh Good
Lower leg/foot Good
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics Good

Moderate overlap front: updated test

Rating applies to 2023-26 models

Overall evaluation Good
Structure and safety cage Good
Driver injury measures
Head/neck Good
Chest Good
Thigh/hip Good
Leg/foot Good
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics Good
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck Good
Chest Good
Thigh Good
Rear passenger restraints and dummy kinematics Acceptable

Side: updated test

Rating applies to 2020-26 models

Overall evaluation Good
Structure and safety cage Good
Driver injury measures
Head/neck Good
Torso Good
Pelvis Acceptable
Driver head protection Good
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck Good
Torso Good
Pelvis Good
Rear passenger head protection Good

Front crash prevention: pedestrian

Rating applies to all 2025-26 models Β· standard Pre-Collision Assist

Overall evaluation Good
View the IIHS report

Opens on iihs.org in a new tab

How the score is built

Primary IIHS tests (55%)
97.0
3/4 reported Β· small overlap, updated moderate overlap, updated side, headlights
Occupant-protection details (25%)
90.0
4/4 reported Β· rear restraints, rear head, safety cage, front restraints
Pedestrian front crash prevention (10%)
100.0
IIHS pedestrian AEB result: Good
Class context (10%)
86.0
Damped class-level driver death-rate term; award status is shown above but carries no weight
Injury-measure average (tiebreak only)
98.12
Average of 40 IIHS injury ratings across frontal and side tests (used only as a tiebreaker).

See our full scoring methodology and rules β†’

NHTSA 5-star rating

2026 LINCOLN AVIATOR GAS SUV N/A AWD

Overallβ˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Frontal crashβ˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Side crashβ˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Rolloverβ˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜† 15.1% risk

NHTSA stars are shown for reference and carry no weight in the score. NHTSA source. Why the two programs disagree β†’

IIHS crash-test videos

These videos are embedded on IIHS’s ratings page for this model. The tested vehicle may be an earlier model year or a related version whose results IIHS applies to this vehicle. Check the test description and source for the exact coverage.

Load a player to watch on this page, or use the YouTube link. Video footage helps explain the test; the published injury measurements and ratings are the basis for comparison.

Real-world context

MeasureResultWhat it covers
Class driver death rate11 per million registered vehicle-yearsMidsize luxury SUVs as a class, adjusted for driver age and sex (Farmer, 2023); all vehicles average 38. Class context only.

Compared with other midsize luxury SUVs

Closest-scoring current midsize luxury SUVs with complete IIHS records, plus the class leader. See every midsize luxury SUVs ranked β†’

VehicleClass rankIIHS awardRear restraintsStarts atScore
2027 Tesla Model Y #1 of 23 TSP+ Good $39,990 98.6
2026 Lexus NX #12 of 23 TSP+ Acceptable $44,175 94.8
2026 BMW X5 #13 of 23 TSP+ Acceptable $68,300 94.7
2026 Mercedes-Benz GLC #14 of 23 TSP Acceptable $49,550 93.6

Our analysis

The 2026 Lincoln Aviator belongs to the Midsize luxury SUVs class. This class has one of the lowest driver death rates of any category, well below the national average of 38 deaths per million registered vehicle-years, reflecting mass, structure, and typical driver demographics. The class figure is adjusted for driver age and sex, which removes a large part of the selection effect in raw death rates. It is still a class average, not a measurement of this model.

The Lincoln Aviator has no IIHS Top Safety Pick award in the 2026 award cycle. That can mean a result below the award threshold in one test, or tests IIHS has not completed. Absence of an award is not evidence that the vehicle is unsafe.

Across the 3 IIHS rating categories reported, the Lincoln Aviator earned 3 Good ratings. Check the occupant-protection details above as well; a Good headline result can hide a weaker rear-seat subscore.

This analysis is produced independently; we have no affiliation with Lincoln or any manufacturer. Read the full methodology or learn more about us.

Safety recalls for the 2026 Lincoln Aviator

We do not have a verified NHTSA recall lookup for this model and year. An unmatched or unavailable lookup is not evidence of a clean recall record.

Recall campaigns from the NHTSA recalls database, retrieved 2026-09-16. A recall applies to a range of build dates, not necessarily every car of this model year, so confirm against your own VIN. Recalls do not affect the safety score on this page.

Questions about the 2026 Lincoln Aviator

Is the 2026 Lincoln Aviator a safe car?

IIHS has published 3 of the 4 primary tests and 4 of the 4 occupant-protection details for the 2026 Lincoln Aviator. Available results are shown below. Only current models with all required results enter the ranking.

What is the 2026 Lincoln Aviator IIHS rating?

IIHS reports: small overlap front = Good; moderate overlap front: updated test = Good; side: updated test = Good.

Is the 2026 Lincoln Aviator an IIHS Top Safety Pick?

No. The 2026 Lincoln Aviator does not hold an IIHS Top Safety Pick award for the 2026 model year, which can reflect a result below Good in a qualifying test or tests that IIHS has not yet completed.

What is the 2026 Lincoln Aviator NHTSA rating?

NHTSA gives the 2026 LINCOLN AVIATOR GAS SUV N/A AWD an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars (frontal 5, side 5, rollover 4). NHTSA stars are shown for reference and are not part of our score.

How does the 2026 Lincoln Aviator compare with other midsize luxury SUVs?

The class leader is the 2027 Tesla Model Y at 98.6/100. The comparison table on this page lists the closest-scoring current midsize luxury SUVs with complete records.